BLI vs. SPR for VHH Binding Kinetics: Which to Run?
VHHs (nanobodies) are small — typically 12–15 kDa — which makes precise kinetic resolution harder on any platform. Here's how the two main techniques compare, and when each one is the right call.
BLI and SPR, side by side
VHHs' small size makes precise kinetic resolution harder on either platform, but once you've narrowed to a shortlist, SPR's sensitivity generally makes it the better choice for the kon/koff/KD data that drives affinity maturation and SAR decisions. BLI stays useful upstream if you already have panel-scale screening to do first. Litmus's network runs SPR for this kind of confirmatory kinetics work.
Have a VHH shortlist ready?
Start your request in the Litmus platform — tell us your target and analyte, and a qualified lab will confirm surface chemistry and turnaround.
Get an SPR Quote →Or email us directly. No spam, ever.